Affiliation:
1. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
AbstractMist nets may be opened at different heights in the forest, but they are seldom used over 3 m above the ground. We used two different methods to compare species richness, composition, and relative abundance and trophic structure of the bird assemblage at Ilha Grande (with a 290 birds standardization): conventional ground-level nets (0-2.4 m height range) and elevated nets (0-17 m) with an adjustable-height system (modified from Humphrey et al., 1968) that we call vertically-mobile nets. There were significant differences in capture frequencies between methods for about 20% of the species (Chi-squared test, P<0.05), and the two methods caught different assemblages. Ground-level nets recorded less species, and they comparatively overestimated mainly Suboscine insectivores and underestimated frugivores and nectarivores. Different sampling methods used at the same location may result in very different diagnoses of the avifauna present, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We encourage studies involving mist net sampling to include the upper strata to more accurately represent the avifauna in Atlantic Forest.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference58 articles.
1. Degree of threat to the biological diversity in the Ilha Grande State Park (RJ) and guidelines for conservation;Alho CJR;Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia,2002
2. Ornitologia e conservação - da ciência às estratégias;Alves MAS,2001
3. Sistemas de migrações de aves em ambientes terrestres no Brasil: exemplos, lacunas e propostas para o avanço do conhecimento;Alves MAS;Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia,2007
4. Birds, Ilha Grande, state of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil;Alves MAS;Check List,2009
5. Ground versus canopy methods for the study of birds in tropical forest canopies: implications for ecology and conservation;Anderson DL;The Condor,2009
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献