CONSTRUCT VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE LEG ULCER MEASUREMENT TOOL SCALE ADAPTED FOR BRAZIL

Author:

Silveira Isabelle Andrade1ORCID,Oliveira Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista de1ORCID,Souza Priscilla Alfradique de2ORCID,Oliveira Bianca Campos1ORCID,Sergio Fernanda Rabello1ORCID,Carvalho Magali Rezende de3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brasil

2. Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

3. Loyola University of Chicago, Estados Unidos

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the Portuguese version of the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool regarding construct and reliability. Method: this is a methodological research study. Data collection was conducted between January and July 2019. A total of 105 participants were included for construct validation and internal consistency and, of these, 50 were selected for intra-observer stability. For the analysis of construct validity, factor analysis was performed; for internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated, and for stability, the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 12items were confirmed for the Brazilian reality, meeting all the theoretical requirements of the factor analysis model. As for the internal consistency (reliability) analysis, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient values (α=0.711) showed that the set of items that make up the scale measures the same characteristics and presents internal consistency. In the global stability analysis (ICC=0.823), the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool test and retest scores presented good agreement, showing that the adapted scale is stable. Conclusion: the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool scale adapted to the Portuguese language contains 12 items, with scores varying from 0 to 4 and, thus, produces a score from 0 to 48 points. It presents construct validity analyzed by means of factor analysis and reliability in terms of internal consistency and stability.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference32 articles.

1. Using the new TIME Clinical Decision Support Tool to promote consistent holistic wound management and eliminate variation in practice: part 2 at the SygehusSønderjylland Hospital, Sønderborg, Denmark;Jelnes R;Wounds International,2019

2. Br J Nurs;Lumbers M,2018

3. Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review;Garbuio DC;Rev Eletr Enf,2018

4. An overview of instruments for wound and skin assessment and healing;Arndt JV;J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2014

5. Pressure ulcer PUSH score and traditional nursing assessment in nursing home residents: do they correlate?;George-Saintilus E;J Am Med Dir Assoc,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3