Affiliation:
1. Universidade de Brasília, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract This article aims to advance the discussion about the influence of knowledge and policy learning on policy change, taking the Advocacy Coalition Framework as reference. We propose unlinking the comprehension of learning through change in two perspectives. First, we suggest apprehending the relation between knowledge and policy learning, through the use of knowledge, assuming that different forms of learning are possible, depending on the context of decision-making. Then, relying on the contributions of the theory of gradual institutional change, we suggest using the notion of institutional dynamics, in order to capture the explanatory power of knowledge and policy learning both in stasis and change situations. We aim to contribute to diminish the skepticism presented in the literature about the influence of knowledge and policy learning in the policy process.
Reference40 articles.
1. Public Forest Policy Development in New Brunswick, Canada: multiple streams approach, advocacy coalition framework, and the role of science;Anderson W. F. A;Ecology and Society,2015
2. Advocating for Change? How a Civil Society-led Coalition Influences the Implementation of the Forest Rights Act in India;Barnes C;World Development,2016
3. heories of the Policy Process;Baumgartner F. R,2014
4. Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem;Capano G;Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,2009
5. Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions;Dunlop C. A;Political Studies,2013
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献