Affiliation:
1. São Paulo Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Brazil
2. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract Protected areas are the main instrument used for protecting and conserving nature (UN, 2018). In Brazil, these areas are called Unidades de Conservação (UCs), or Conservation Units in English, and despite their territorial coverage and the complexity of their problems, they have not been properly studied by the area of administration. As a result, in this article we aimed to broaden the understanding about the modes of existence, as well as about the management of a protected area in a particular territory. For this, we took a pragmatist epistemological approach, favoring action above all. The study material derives from ethnographic research using participant observation at a UC managed by the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity (ICMBio). As results, we identified three distinct modes of existence of the organization, namely: environmental education; production of expertise; and protection and inspection of nature. The analysis of these modes of existence enabled a better understanding of how specific organizational configurations emerge that situationally position the actors in different ways, engendering collective action and its management. Finally, we forge arguments that highlight possible contributions of a pragmatist epistemology to the organizational analysis of UCs.
Reference44 articles.
1. Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs;Akrich M,2016
2. Polysémie de l’implication;Ardoino J,1983
3. Experts et faussaires. Por une sociologie de la perception;Bessy C.,2014
4. Governança ambiental no Brasil: ecos do passado;Câmara J. B. D;Revista de Sociologia e Política,2013
5. Como nos mobilizamos? A contribuição de uma abordagem pragmatista para a sociologia da ação coletiva;Cefaï D;Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social,2009
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献