Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder

Author:

Sanguebuche Taissane Rodrigues1ORCID,Peixe Bruna Pias1ORCID,Garcia Michele Vargas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: to generate reference values for different behavioral central auditory processing (CAP) tests in normally hearing adults, with age stratification, as well as to compare the results, according to the presence or absence of CAP disorder (CAPD). Methods: the study sample consisted of 94 adults with normal auditory thresholds, with at least 11 years of schooling, who were divided into two groups, according to the performance in the Dichotic Sentences Identification Test (DSI), Masking Level Difference (MLD), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), Adapted Time-Compressed Speech (ATCS) and Duration and Frequency Pattern Tests (DPT/FPT).The 64 subjects who presented normality in all the tests formed the G1 group and the 30 subjects who presented alteration in at least one of them, originated the G2 group. To accomplish the analysis it was used the Mann-Whitney U Test. In all analyzes, the significance level was 5% (p≤0.05). Results: the sum of the two standard deviations for the mean performance of G1 yielded reference values for the different tests addressed. When G1 and G2 groups were compared, G1 presented better results, this being significant in the DSI (left ear), MLD, RGDT, DPT and FPT tests, for the group aged between 18 and 29 years and, DSI (right ear), RGDT and ATCS (right ear), for the group from 30 to 58 years. Conclusion: it was possible to generate reference values for different behavioral tests of CAP in normally hearing adults, as well as to verify a better performance for the group with no CAPD.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference34 articles.

1. Processamento auditivo: estudo em crianças com distúrbios da leitura e da escrita;Frota S;Rev Psicopedag,2010

2. Resolução temporal de crianças comparação entre audição normal, perda auditiva condutiva e distúrbio do processamento auditivo;Balen SA;Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol,2009

3. Reconhecimento de sentenças no ruído, em campo livre, em indivíduos com e sem perda auditiva;Henriques MO;Rev. CEFAC,2011

4. Análise das habilidades auditivas de crianças com respiração oral;Correa BM;Rev. CEFAC,2011

5. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo formal em crianças com transtorno de processamento auditivo (central): avaliação comportamental e eletrofisiológica;Alonso R;Braz J Otorhinolaryngol,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3