ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES

Author:

LAGO LEONARDO1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de Cambridge, Reino Unido

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article presents a theoretical work aiming to discuss methodologies and methods in educational research, particularly those that analyse classroom discursive interactions. The first part examines the two main research paradigms and their ontological and epistemological bases: positivism and interpretivism. Next, two methods for analysing discursive interactions are presented and discussed, one for each paradigm. Systematic coding - within the quantitative context - is indicated to treat data from large samples, to describe general patterns, and to statistical comparisons or temporal analyses by transforming the discourse into variables. The method is applied in a set of 42 episodes of group dialogue. The results are discussed in light of the nature of the research questions, showing what types of statistical tests can be performed. Within the interpretivist paradigm, sociocultural discourse analysis is presented as an example of a qualitative method applied to excerpts from classroom dialogues. The main finding is the identification of typologies that describe how teachers and students construct scientific explanations. The final part discusses some possibilities and limits of each method. The conclusion defends that both are complementary for advancing knowledge in the educational field.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Reference52 articles.

1. Culture and pedagogy: international comparisons in primary education;ALEXANDER Robin,2001

2. Towards dialogic teaching: rethinking classroom talk;ALEXANDER Robin,2008

3. Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning;ASTERHAN Christa S. C.;Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal,2020

4. From communication to curriculum;BARNES Douglas,1976

5. Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education: Scientific Explanations;BRAATEN Melissa;Science Education,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3