Affiliation:
1. Liverpool University, China
Abstract
ABSTRACT Much of the scholarly work on Brazilian federalism has long focused on the ways in which decentralization has produced institutional paralysis under intergovernmental conflict. This article, by contrast, suggests that Brazil has been under a gradual transformation since its democratization, which led to a recentralization of power in the hands of the federal government. It presents a framework that explains how an initial decentralization process (1983-1994) turned into a centralization process (1995-2007) that ultimately increased the regulatory and coordination powers of the Brazilian federal government. In addition, the analysis shows that two main blocs of political parties competed to influence the sequence and speed of legislation related to the decentralization and centralization processes. Specifically, these parties used two competing temporal strategies – foot-dragging and pace-setting – to slow down or accelerate the approval of legislation regulating subnational autonomy. Once the centralizing bloc of parties enacted key centralizing legislation, they used the strategy of fence-building to institutionalize intergovernmental relations, thereby consolidating the coordination powers of the center. The main contribution of this article is to advance a temporal approach to federal changes, which explains how the Brazilian federal government centralized authority under a decentralizing Constitution.
Reference74 articles.
1. Os barões da federação: os governadores e a redemocratização brasileira;ABRUCIO Fernando,1998
2. A coordenação federativa no Brasil: a experiência do período FHC e os desafios do governo Lula;ABRUCIO Fernando;Revista de Sociologia e Política,2005
3. Recentralizando a Federação?;ALMEIDA Maria Hermínia Tavares;Revista de Sociologia e Política,2005
4. Legislative Politics in Latin America;AMORIM NETO Octavio,2002
5. Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics;AMORIM NETO Octavio,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Brazil’s Digital Politics and the Crisis of Democracy (2013-2018);Election and Democracy in the Digital Age - Status, Challenges, and Trends [Working Title];2022-09-07