Post-COVID-19 functional capacity assessed with ring and walk tests: cross-sectional study

Author:

Tozato Claudia1ORCID,Molinari Camila Vitelli2ORCID,Ferreira Bruno Fernandes Costa3ORCID,Xavier Vivian Bertoni3ORCID,Alves Vera Lúcia dos Santos2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual “Francisco Morato de Oliveira”, Brazil

2. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil; Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil

3. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 can cause persistent symptoms even in mild cases, such as fatigue and dyspnea, which can reduce functional capacity and make it difficult to perform activities of daily living. Objective To compare functional capacity using the pegboard and ring test and the six-minute walk test responses in post-COVID-19 patients according to the ventilatory support used. Methods Cross-sectional study including 40 adults of both sexes after SARS-CoV2 infection between June 2020 and June 2021, with assessment of functional capacity using the pegboard and ring test (upper limbs) and the six-minute walk (lower limbs). Those who reported comprehension deficit or neuromuscular disease were excluded. All participants were evaluated between 15 and 90 days after the onset of symptoms, diagnosed by nasal swab and classified according to the ventilatory support used during the infection. Results The mean age of the participants (n = 40) was 54.30 (±12.76) years, with BMI 28.39 (±4.70) kg/m2 and pulmonary involvement in 51.49 (±17.47)%. A total of 37 participants were hospitalized with a stay of 14.33 (±15.44) days, and 30% were previously immunized, while 7.5% reached the predicted distance covered. The average achieved was 46.44% (398.63 ± 130.58 m) in the distance covered and 39.31% (237.58 ± 85.51) in the movement of rings. Participants who had invasive mechanical ventilation (n = 10) had the worst functional capacity in both tests 265.85 ± 125.11 m and 181.00 ± 90.03 rings, compared to 472.94 ± 88.02 m and 273.25 ± 66.09 rings in non-invasive ventilation (n = 8), 410.32 ± 90.39 m and 257.68 ± 62.84 rings in oxygen therapy (n = 19), 569.00 ± 79.50 m and 203.00 ± 169.00 rings when there was no hospitalization (n = 3). Conclusion Participants who required invasive mechanical ventilation had worse functional capacity, 46% of what was expected in the walk test and 39% of what was expected in the pegboard and ring test.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Complementary and Manual Therapy

Reference31 articles.

1. Reabilitação cardiopulmonar em pacientes pós-COVID-19: série de casos;Tozato C;Rev Bras Ter Intensiva,2021

2. Functional capacity and rehabilitation strategies in Covid-19 patients: current knowledge and challenges;Frota AX;Rev Soc Bras Med Trop,2021

3. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on pulmonary function in early convalescence phase;Huang Y;Respir Res,2020

4. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome;Nalbandian A;Nat Med,2021

5. Pulmonary long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections after hospital discharge;Blanco JR;Clin Microbiol Infect,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3