Affiliation:
1. Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece
2. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
3. University of St Andrews, United Kingdom
Abstract
ABSTRACT We review recent theoretical literature pointing to the ineffectiveness, in terms of welfare impact, of currently applied sanctioning regimes for cartels by Competition Authorities (CAs). We then provide a comparison of the regimes taking also into account criteria related to ease of implementation and transparency. We argue the case for switching to a penalty regime, in which the penalty base continues to be the currently dominant penalty base of cartel revenue but in which, in contrast to current practice, the penalty rate is based on the rate commonly estimated in order to calculate damages in private damage claims, that is, the overcharge rate.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference28 articles.
1. The determination of optimal fines in cartel cases: theory and practice;ALLAIN M-L.;Concurrences - Competition Law Journal,2011
2. The distortive effects of antitrust fines based on revenue;BAGERI V.;The Economic Journal,2013
3. A simple quantitative methodology for the setting of optimal fines by antitrust and regulatory authorities;BAGERI V.;European Competition Journal,2014
4. Crime and punishment: an economic approach;BECKER G. S;Journal of Political Economy,1968
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献