Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the agreement and disagreement between the assessments by applying or not a patient classification instrument, and to investigate the association between the agreement and personal and professional characteristics of the evaluators. Method: This is a descriptive exploratory study. 105 patients were hospitalized in a teaching hospital in the state of Sao Paulo, using the kappa statistic (weighted) and the Bootstrap method. Results: The agreement between the assessments were: kw 0.87 (instrument x internal evaluator), kw 0.78 (instrument x external evaluator) and kw 0.76 (between evaluators) and the influence of some personal and professional characteristics. The assessments conducted through the use of an instrument contemplated a greater number of areas of care in relation to when the instrument was not applied. Conclusion: The use of this instrument is recommended in order to more effectively identify care needs of patients.
Reference24 articles.
1. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet];Bittencourt GKGD,2013
2. Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing;Tanner CA;J Nurs Educ.,2006
3. Think Reason [Internet];Harvey N,2001
4. Using judgment to improve accuracy in decision-making;Dowding D;Nurs Times.,2004
5. Online J Issues Nurs [internet];Lunney M,2008
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献