Affiliation:
1. Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia; Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
2. Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In epidemiological studies, misclassification error, especially differential misclassification, has serious implications. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate how differential misclassification error (DME) and non-differential misclassification error (NDME) occur in a case-control design and to describe the trends in DME and NDME. METHODS: Different sensitivity levels, specificity levels, prevalence rates and odds ratios were simulated. Interaction graphics were constructed to study bias in the different settings, and the effect of the different factors on bias was described using linear models. RESULTS: One hundred per cent of the biases caused by NDME were negative. DME biased the association positively more often than it did negatively (70 versus 30%), increasing or decreasing the OR estimate towards the null hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the sensitivity and specificity in classifying exposure, the prevalence of exposure in controls and true OR differed between positive and negative biases. The use of valid exposure classification instruments with high sensitivity and high specificity is recommended to mitigate this type of bias.
Subject
Epidemiology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine
Reference24 articles.
1. Epidemiologic Research Principles and Quantitative Methods;Kleinbaum D,1982
2. Modern Epidemiology;Rothman K,2012
3. dos-Santos I.Cancer Epidemiology: Principles and Methods.,1999
4. Misclassification bias: diversity in conceptualisations about having 'had sex'. Sex;Sanders SA;Health,2010
5. Measuring psychotropic drug exposures in register-based studies - validity of a dosage assumption of one unit per day in older Finns;Rikala M;Int J Methods Psychiatr Res,2013
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献