Limitations in differentiating vascular dementia from Alzheimer's disease with brief cognitive tests

Author:

Matioli Maria Niures P.S.1,Caramelli Paulo2

Affiliation:

1. Lusíada University School of Medicine, Brazil; University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Brazil

2. University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Brazil; the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of brief cognitive tests in differentiating vascular dementia (VaD) from Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHOD: Fifteen patients with mild VaD, 15 patients with mild probable AD and 30 healthy controls, matched for age, education and dementia severity, were submitted to the following cognitive tests: clock drawing (free drawing and copy), category and letter fluency, delayed recall test of figures and the EXIT 25 battery. RESULTS: VaD patients performed worse than AD patients in category fluency (p=0.014), letter fluency (p=0.043) and CLOX 2 (p=0.023), while AD cases performed worse than VaD patients in delayed recall (p=0.013). However, ROC curves for these tests displayed low sensitivity and specificity for the differential diagnosis between VaD and AD. CONCLUSION: Although the performance of VaD and AD patients was significantly different in some cognitive tests, the value of such instruments in differentiating VaD from AD proved to be very limited.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Neurology,Clinical Neurology

Reference24 articles.

1. Epidemiologic survey of dementia in a community-dwelling Brazilian population;Herrera Júnior E;Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord,2002

2. Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia;Róman GC;Lancet Neurol,2002

3. Differences in executive functioning between Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic vacular dementia.;Yuspeh RL;J Clin Exp Neuropsychol,2002

4. Neuropsychology of cognitive ageing, minimal cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular cognitive impairment;Lindeboom J;Eur J Pharmacol,2004

5. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV),1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3