Invariance across sex, school, and educational level to Learning Approaches Scale (EABAP)

Author:

Gomes Cristiano Mauro Assis1ORCID,Farias Heitor Blesa1ORCID,Jelihovschi Enio Galinkin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Minas, Brazil

2. Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract The Learning Approaches Scale (EABAP) showed evidence of structural and external validity in assessing the deep and surface approach of elementary and high school students. However, this evidence is supported only by participants from a single school. The present study evaluates the generality of EABAP by verifying through the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis whether this scale is invariant across sex, type of school, and educational level variables. The sample consisted of 2,148 students from elementary school II, high school, and higher education in public and private schools. The results indicate configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance for the sex variable; configural, partial metric, and partial scalar invariance for the educational level variable; and configural, partial metric, and scalar invariance for the type of school variable. We conclude that it is possible to compare the means of the latent variables measured by EABAP for the groups analyzed in this sample.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference61 articles.

1. Do Students Develop Towards More Deep Approaches to Learning During Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’ Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education;Asikainen H.;Educational Psychology Review,2017

2. Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality;Cangur S.;Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods,2015

3. Program for the neuropsychological stimulation of cognition in students: impact, effectiveness, and transfer effect on student cognitive performance;Cardoso C. O.;Frontiers in Psychology,2019

4. Measuring University Students’ Approaches to Learning Statistics: An Invariance Study;Chiesi F.;Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,2016

5. Investigando a Relação entre Auconceito, Autoeficácia e Autoestima: Construção de evidências a partir da Escala de Cognições Acadêmicas Autorreferentes;Costa B. C. G.,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3