Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
Summary Few studies directly compare urinary cytology with molecular methods for detecting BK and JC polyomaviruses. Reactivation of BKV infection is the main risk factor for the development of nephropathy in immunocompromised individuals. The limitation of the cytological method can be attributed to the stage where the infected cell does not have specific and sufficient morphological characteristics for a conclusive diagnosis and can be easily interpreted as degenerative alteration. Moreover, morphologically, it is not possible to differentiate the two types of viruses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), not only is a sensitive method, but also allows differentiation of viral types without quantification, and therefore is not indicative of nephropathy. According to the American Society of Nephrology, real-time PCR would be the gold standard to indicate nephropathy because it allows quantifying the number of viral copies.
Reference14 articles.
1. Koss' diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases;Koss LG,2006
2. New human papovavirus (B K.) isolated from urine after renal transplantation;Gardner SD;Lancet,1971
3. Polyomavirus infection of renal allograft recipients from latent infection to manifest disease;Nickeleit V;J Am Soc Nephrol,1999
4. Testing for polyomavirus type BK DNA in plasma to identify renal-allograft recipients with virus nephropathy;Nickeleit V;N Engl J Med,2000
5. BK virus infection after kidney transplantation;Nickeleit V;Graft,2002
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献