Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations

Author:

Kottwitz Fernanda1,Gouveia Helga Geremias2,Gonçalves Annelise de Carvalho2

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Sofia Feldman, Brazil

2. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Identify the route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations. Method: Cross-sectional study with 361 mothers from a university hospital. Data were obtained using a structured questionnaire from February to April 2013. Descriptive analysis was performed and the Chi-square test was used to verify association among the variables. Results: 77.6% of the women preferred vaginal delivery and the reason reported by 81.8% of them was easier recovery postpartum; 20.5% believed they took part in the decision-making concerning the type of delivery; 64.5% believed the type of delivery they experienced did not involve risk for themselves, while 21.9% believed it involved risk for the newborn. Statistical association was found between number of deliveries and type of previous delivery with the preferred route of delivery. Conclusion: Women did not have adequate knowledge regarding the risks and benefits of different types of delivery and for this reason were not empowered to exert their autonomy in regard to this decision.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference22 articles.

1. Fatores que influenciam na escolha da via de parto cirúrgica: uma revisão bibliográfica;Pimentel TA;Universitas: Ciênc Saúde,2016

2. Do parto institucionalizado ao parto domiciliar;Sanfelice CFO;Rev RENE,2014

3. Trajetória de humanização do parto no Brasil a partir de uma revisão integrativa de literatura;Santos RAA;Cad Cult Ciênc,2015

4. Interrelations between four antepartum obstetric interventions and cesarean delivery in women at low risk: a systematic review and modeling of the cascade of interventions;Rossignol M;Birth,2014

5. DATASUS: Sistema de Informação de Nascidos Vivos (SINASC) 2015

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3