Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Brasil
Abstract
Abstract The sociology of knowledge that became established as an academic discipline ‘lives’ alongside another that never did so, but nevertheless manifests itself within other disciplines, including the philosophy of science, the history of science, and intellectual history. I discuss the ways in which each of them has evolved. I argue that while the former works by reflecting on the conditions of possibility of the production of knowledge about knowledge itself, the nature of the knowledge produced under these conditions, the metatheoretical ‘dilemmas’ that supposedly plague the production of this knowledge, the means by which these dilemmas can be ‘overcome,’ the conceptual problems supposedly involved in the production of this knowledge, and the ways through which these conceptual problems can be solved, the latter works by offering solutions to specific empirical problems.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference29 articles.
1. Interests and the growth of knowledge;Barnes Barry,1977
2. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge;Berger Peter,1966
3. Knowledge and social imagery;Bloor David,1976
4. Reflexivity, agency and constraint: the paradoxes of Bourdieu’s sociology of knowledge;Bohman James;Social Epistemology,1997
5. The situated social scientist: reflexivity and perspective in the sociology of knowledge;Burkitt Ian;Social Epistemology,1997
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. References;The Know-How of Public Leaders in Collective Politics;2024-06-24
2. TOWARDS RECONCILING THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY;Sociologia & Antropologia;2023