Perceptions about the “Mais Médicos” Program and the Academic Supervision Process

Author:

Shimizu Helena Eri1ORCID,Santos Leonor Maria Pacheco1ORCID,Sanchez Mauro Niskier1ORCID,Hone Thomas2ORCID,Millett Christopher2ORCID,Harris Matthew2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de Brasília, Brazil

2. Imperial College, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: This study aims to analyze the perceptions of the involved actors about the “Mais Médicos” Program (PMM) and the academic supervision process, its strengths and weaknesses aiming to improve Primary Heath Care practices. Method: Qualitative study carried out through 05 in-depth interviews with PMM supervising doctors, and 24 interviews with unit managers, 12 Primary Heath Care coordinators, and 07 Secondary Health Care doctors. Results: Three thematic axes emerged from de analysis: benefits of the program for the municipalities and for the population; the challenges of the supervisory process and the difficulties of the fragmented health system. Conclusions: The actors’ perception of the “Mais Médicos” Program are positive, especially because it brought doctors to municipalities with vulnerable areas, where doctors did not go to and where they did not stay. Supervision is an important support for continuing in-service training; however, it requires a better articulation with the different levels of the health system management. The precariousness of the service network limits the performance of both doctors and supervisors, demonstrating that it is necessary to invest in a solid and effective care network. Moreover, it was once again evident that the population will face a shortage of doctors due to changes in health policies. It is necessary to build more comprehensive policies, that will not only result in sporadic provision of medical care. There is a need for continuous actions, better integrated to the healthcare networks, aiming at an efficient and effective healthcare system.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference33 articles.

1. Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention: global policy recommendations,2010

2. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce;Dussault G;Hum Resour Health,2006

3. Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews;Chopra M;Lancet,2008

4. Systematic review of effective retention incentives for health workers in rural and remote areas: towards evidence-based policy;Buykx P;Aust J Rural Health,2010

5. Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in rural Canada and Australia: a review of the literature;Viscomi M;Can J Rural Med,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3