STUDY OF THE DIAMETER OF THE OBLIQUE CORRIDOR IN LATERAL DECUBITUS AND DORSAL DECUBITUS: RADIOLOGICAL STUDY

Author:

BATISTA MATHEUS CARVALHO1ORCID,AMARAL RODRIGO AUGUSTO DO2ORCID,MELO FILHO FERNANDO ANTONIO DE1ORCID,POKORNY GABRIEL2ORCID,DAHER MURILO3ORCID,PRATALI RAPHAEL4ORCID,ARNONI DANIEL1ORCID,MORIGUCHI RAFAEL1ORCID,PIMENTA LUIZ1ORCID,HERRERO CARLOS FERNANDO P. S.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, Brazil

2. Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, Brazil; Brazilian Spine Study Group, Brazil

3. Brazilian Spine Study Group, Brazil; Centro de Reabilitação e Readaptação Dr. Henrique Santillo (CRER), Brazil

4. Brazilian Spine Study Group, Brazil; Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, Brazil

5. Brazilian Spine Study Group, Brazil; Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - USP, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Degenerative intervertebral disc disease and its impact on quality of life when associated with sagittal misalignmentis a current topic in the literature. The technique known as OLIF derives from the need to use anterior cage stop romote stabilization of the affected segment, indirect decompression, restoration of segmental lordosis, and sagittal balance. Methods: Single-center, non-randomized, comparative, observational study. The following variables were measured using magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in dorsal and lateral decubitus, establishing a comparison between the size of the OLIF corridor in the L3L4 and L4L5 segments, as well as a comparison of corridor size between the different positions. Results: There was no difference incorridor size in the comparison between decubitus. However, when the L3L4 and L4L5 levels were compared, there was a significant difference in the size of the corridor in both the lateral and dorsal positions. Conclusion: The present study did not show any difference between the size of the OLIF corridor in L3L4 and L4L5 in the different decubitus, suggesting that thee valuation of the corridor in convention al magnetic resonance images appearstobe safe andreflects the actual size when positio ned for performing the OLIF technique. Level of evidence III; Retrospective study.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference18 articles.

1. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF;Mobbs RJ;J Spine Surg [Internet],2015

2. Defining Spino-Pelvic Alignment Thresholds;Lafage R;SPINE [Internet],2016

3. Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: Oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease;Ohtori S;Yonsei Medical Journal [Internet],2015

4. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion;Mayer HM;Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet],1997

5. Comparative Study of the Difference of Perioperative Complication and Radiologic Results: MIS-DLIF (Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Versus MIS-OLIF (Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion);Jin J;Clin spine surg [Internet],2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3