Evidence and experience: what is the balance in surgeons' training?

Abstract

Surgeons' training requires professionalism, continuing medical education, and appropriate environment to ensure the desirable success. However, generally, this goal is pursued in an inefficient way, based upon intensive training skills founded in the age-old philosophy of "the way I have learned it". There is, usually, a lack of patient outcome evaluation, especially of long-term follow-up of surgical procedures, which in turns provide little evidence of senior surgeons for adequate training junior surgeons. On the other hand, questioning the established knowledge is not stimulated, or even not tolerated by the seniors. It seems like the "truth" is absolute and allows no change for the new knowledge, which would mean no additional progress. There is a need to significantly alter the implementation of new knowledge, if possible based on evidence, to ensure the best medical care for the surgical patient. Experimental surgery, and nowadays bench model surgery, may be useful in minimizing the predictable complications of patients under the surgeon training responsibility, while on learning curve. Surgery based on evidence should be one of the tools for improving patient surgical care, since this important branch of medical activity must rest on two pillars "art and science"; and surgeon in good training needs to be close to both.