Supervisors’ perceptions on errors of nursing students in clinical clerkship: a qualitative research

Author:

Santos Ana Paula Sousa1ORCID,Tavares Márcio Filipe Moniz1ORCID,Duarte Alberto Carlos Marques1ORCID,Sousa Fábio Alexandre Melo do Rego2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade dos Açores, Brazil

2. Unidade de Saúde de Ilha de São Miguel, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: to compare pedagogical supervisors’ and clinical supervisors’ perceptions about the errors made by nursing students in clinical clerkship. Methods: a qualitative exploratory-descriptive study developed with 105 participants. Data collection was performed with a questionnaire with open-ended questions. Content analysis performed according to the conceptual model of student errors in clinical teaching. Results: pedagogical supervisors perceive, in descending order, errors in transversal competencies, in the execution of care and medication. Clinical supervisors perceive, in descending order, the execution of care, medication, and transversal competencies. Final Considerations: there was coincidence and complementarity in clinical supervisors’ and pedagogical supervisors’ perceptions, although not in the same order, regarding the errors made. This study presents contributions related to the existing knowledge in relation to medication errors, which are not the most perceived, and those of transversal competencies, which take on a prominent position.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference22 articles.

1. Nursing students' errors in clinical learning. Qualitative outcomes in Mixed Methods Research;Santos APS;Rev Bras Enferm,2019

2. Exploring how nursing schools handle student errors and near misses;Disch J;Am J Nurs,2017

3. StatPearls;Carver N,2020

4. Medical error: concept, characterization and management;Mendonça V;Saude Soc,2019

5. Development of a safe drug administration assessment instrument for nursing students;Cancino KD;Rev Latino-Am Enferm,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3