Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objectives: to compare the social representations of reproductive biotechnologies among sexual and reproductive health nurses, and their links with professional practice. Methods: an analytical, comparative, qualitative research, supported by the Theory of Social Representation, carried out in May/2014-February/2015, with 32 nurses from the city of Rio de Janeiro. Semi-structured interview, analyzed by ALCESTE® software. Results: nurses not active in assisted human reproduction represent reproductive biotechnologies as unnatural methods of human reproduction, assessing the practice in this field as generalist and bureaucratic. Those who work represent as auxiliary and supporting nature for heterosexual couples, considering the innovative and specialized practice. Final considerations: each group presented specific contents and dimensions about reproductive biotechnologies. The representations are centered on moral, normative and ideological personal values, anchored in the traditional conceptions of human and family reproduction, but also collective, acquired in the professional routine, showing group identity and its distinct practices considering reproductive biotechnologies.
Reference30 articles.
1. Reproductive rights, family planning and assisted human reproduction in Brazil in the current state of the art;Costa APCA;Cad Ibero-Amer Dir Sanit,2016
2. Advances in reproductive biotechnologies;Choudhary KK;Vet World,2016
3. Infertility around the globe new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century;Inhorn MC;Hum Reprod Update,2015
4. [The state of the art of nursing work on assisted reproduction];Leite PA;Rev Inic Cient Ext,2018
5. Assisted conception services and regulation within the Brazilian context;Garcia S;JBRA Assist Reprod,2015