Quantification of blood loss for the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Ruiz Mariana Torreglosa1ORCID,Azevedo Nayara Freitas1ORCID,Resende Cynthya Viana de1ORCID,Rodrigues Wellington Francisco1ORCID,Meneguci Joilson1ORCID,Contim Divanice1ORCID,Wernet Monika2ORCID,Oliveira Carlo José Freire de1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil

2. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descriptor “Postpartum Hemorrhage” associated with keyword “Quantification of Blood Loss”. Tabulated extracted data, presented in metasynthesis and meta-analysis was applied to quantitative data. To assess risk of bias, JBI Appraisal Tools were applied. Results: fourteen studies were included, published between 2006 and 2021. Quantification of loss by any method was superior to visual estimation and is highly recommended, however the studies’ high heterogeneity did not allow estimating this association. Conclusion: the studies’ high heterogeneity, with a probable margin of error given the uncontrolled factors, indicates the need for further studies, however quantification proved to be effective in relation to visual estimate. PROSPERO registration CRD 42021234486.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference50 articles.

1. Epidemiology, prevention and management of early postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review;Feduniw S;Ginekol Pol,2020

2. Hemorragia postparto: donde estamos y hacia dónde vamos?,2018

3. Atonic postpartum hemorrhage: blood loss, risk factors, and third stage management;Lisonkova S;J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2016

4. Recomendações assistenciais para prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento da hemorragia obstétrica[Internet],2018

5. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3