Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil
2. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods to estimate postpartum blood volume loss. Methods: a systematic review of effectiveness according to PRISMA and JBI Protocol. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, with descriptor “Postpartum Hemorrhage” associated with keyword “Quantification of Blood Loss”. Tabulated extracted data, presented in metasynthesis and meta-analysis was applied to quantitative data. To assess risk of bias, JBI Appraisal Tools were applied. Results: fourteen studies were included, published between 2006 and 2021. Quantification of loss by any method was superior to visual estimation and is highly recommended, however the studies’ high heterogeneity did not allow estimating this association. Conclusion: the studies’ high heterogeneity, with a probable margin of error given the uncontrolled factors, indicates the need for further studies, however quantification proved to be effective in relation to visual estimate. PROSPERO registration CRD 42021234486.
Reference50 articles.
1. Epidemiology, prevention and management of early postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review;Feduniw S;Ginekol Pol,2020
2. Hemorragia postparto: donde estamos y hacia dónde vamos?,2018
3. Atonic postpartum hemorrhage: blood loss, risk factors, and third stage management;Lisonkova S;J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2016
4. Recomendações assistenciais para prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento da hemorragia obstétrica[Internet],2018
5. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献