The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma

Author:

Neiva Ricardo Jardim1ORCID,Rodrigues Neto João Felício2ORCID,Alves Ana Paula Oliveira Nascimento2ORCID,Queiroz Patrícia de Sousa Fernandes1ORCID,Siqueira Leila das Graças2ORCID,Lima Clara Cynthia Melo e1ORCID,Dias Francisca Souza Santos1ORCID,Silva-Júnior Renê Ferreira da3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais, Brazil

2. Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Brazil

3. Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to understand the bioethical perspectives on mobile tracking device use. Methods: theoretical study based on action research, carried out with eight graduate students from a public university. A focus group was used, with a thematic content analysis methodology with a codebook structure, approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: from the analysis, there was a concern about using devices after the pandemic ended. Using or not the device, rights inherent to humans, legislation and effectiveness of methods deepen interpretations, moving participants from a personalistic conception of the topic to a vision focused on professional implications about the methods. Final considerations: the debate on the impact of using technological devices on health, especially those that imply restriction of rights that refer to individuals’ private life, involves a discussion of a professional nature, in addition to requirement for clear rules on the topic.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference32 articles.

1. Identificação de situações e condutas bioéticas na atuação profissional em saúde;Souza EV;Rev Bioet,2021

2. Tomada de decisão em (bio)ética clínica: abordagens contemporâneas;Mota LCS;Rev Bioét,2016

3. O nascimento da bioética;Jonsen AR,1998

4. Bioethics and sociology: the place of social studies of science and technology;Lorenzo C;Interface Comun Saúde Educ,2023

5. Proteção de dados pessoais e direito à privacidade no contexto da pandemia de covid-19: uma análise das aplicações de contact tracing à luz da proporcionalidade;Silva AM;Rev Direito GV,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3