Effectiveness of the automated drug dispensing system: systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Carvalho Márglory Fraga de1ORCID,Marques Juliana Mendes1ORCID,Marta Cristiano Bertolossi2ORCID,Peregrino Antônio Augusto de Freitas2ORCID,Schutz Vivian1ORCID,Silva Roberto Carlos Lyra da1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: to compare the effectiveness of the decentralized automated drug dispensing system with pockets. Methods: an effectiveness study based on a systematic review guided by the question: for patients admitted to hospital units, is the use of automated drug dispensing effective for reducing medication errors when compared to manual unit dose dispensing? The evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses instrument, used in the report. Results: the sample was composed of 15 studies and none of them directly compared both technologies; however, the meta-analysis showed that there is no difference in effectiveness between them [OR 1.03 95%CI (0,12 - 8,99)]. Conclusions: the conclusion is that the recommendation in favor of the automated dispensing system is weak.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference31 articles.

1. Top 10 Technology Health Hazards for 2015;Health Devices [Internet],2014

2. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication error rates in an adult medical intensive care unit;DeYoung JL;Am J Health Syst Pharm,2009

3. Options for slowing the growth of health care costs;Mongan JJ;N Engl J Med [Internet],2008

4. Diretrizes metodológicas: estudos de avaliação econômica de tecnologias em saúde,2009

5. Comparative Effectiveness Research: A report from the Institute of Medicine;Sox HC;Ann Intern Med,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3