Workload: a comparison between the online and observational methods

Author:

Somensi Rute Merlo1,Caregnato Rita Catalina Aquino1,Cervi Gustavo Henrique1,Flores Cecilia Dias1

Affiliation:

1. Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To measure nursing Workload (WL) of nurses who work in the Inpatient Unit, as recommended by the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), comparing observational and online methods to propose supervision strategies for academic professionals. Method: Quantitative, descriptive, observational study performed in a Clinical/Surgical Hospital Unit. 30 direct and indirect activities. Data collected in observational and online records. Statistical analysis: SPSS 18.0 software, percentage frequencies and associated times between groups by Fisher's Exact test, 95% confidence interval, significance level 5%. Results: Comparing the activities performed with the NIC time: from the direct 16, five observational and five online, were out of range, with no significant difference between frequencies (P=0.427). Of the 14 indirect, only in the observational, two were out of the range, without significant difference (P=0.486). Conclusion: Both methods measure WL; the online method developed accompanies activities performed in real time.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference20 articles.

1. Nursing workload in an intensive care unit of a teaching hospital;Panunto MR;Acta Paul Enferm,2012

2. Nursing workloads and working conditions: integrative review;Schmoeller R;Rev Gaúcha Enferm,2011

3. Gestão em Enfermagem: ferramenta para a prática segura;Fugulin FMT,2011

4. How much time do nurses have for patients? a longitudinal study quantifying hospital nurses' patterns of task time distribution and interactions with health professionals;Westbrook JI;BMC Health Serv Res,2011

5. Dimensionamento dos Profissionais de Enfermagem: uma revisão da produção indexada na biblioteca virtual da saúde;Sordi LP,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3