Perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth

Author:

Arik Roberta Marielle1ORCID,Parada Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima1ORCID,Tonete Vera Lúcia Pamplona1ORCID,Sleutjes Fernanda Cristina Manzini2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Brazil

2. aculdade Sudoeste Paulista, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to understand the perceptions and expectations of pregnant women about the type of birth. Method: this is a qualitative research, based on the assumptions of the Humanization of Obstetric Care. 15 pregnant women were interviewed twice at the beginning and the end of gestation between October 2015 and May 2016. Data were analyzed according to the method of the Discourse of the Collective Subject. Results: the discourses were associated with four themes: Advantages of vaginal birth over cesarean section; Fear and unpredictability of vaginal birth; Importance of the doctor in the definition of the type of birth; and Influence of family and friends in choosing the type of birth. Final considerations: according to pregnant women, vaginal birth has more benefit compared to cesarean section. However, during gestation and birth, fear of pain and the unexpected, and medical opinions of friends and family against vaginal birth strongly influence the choice of cesarean section.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference26 articles.

1. Do parto institucionalizado ao parto domiciliar;Sanfelice CFO;Rev Rene,2014

2. Parto normal e cesárea: representações sociais de mulheres que os vivenciaram;Velho MB;Rev Bras Enferm,2014

3. Determinants of women's preference for cesarean section;Copelli FHS;Texto Contexto Enferm,2015

4. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? a systematic review of the qualitative literature;O'Donovan C;Birth,2018

5. Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study;Chen SW;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3