Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objectives: to identify the scientific evidence of the elements of communication in the process of communicating bad news in pediatrics. Methods: integrative review searched in the LILACS, PubMed and WoS databases. Primary studies in Portuguese, Spanish or English were included. Results: the evidence from the 40 studies were organized according to the elements of communication: sender (family and/or professional), receiver (family and/or child), message (bad or difficult news about diagnosis/prognosis; empathetically, honestly, objective, hopeful and available), channel (materials, quality, quantity and pace), context and effects (social and emotional changes), noise (feelings and language) and failures (silencing and misleading information). Conclusions: there is a need to prepare the institution and team, as well as the family and the child, in order to promote co-responsibility in this process, to minimize suffering and communication noise and to avoid failures, recognizing the child’s right to know their condition.
Reference50 articles.
1. Breaking bad news in clinical setting: a systematic review;Singh D;Indian J Appl Res [Internet],2018
2. Face-to-face communication between patients and family physicians in Canada: a scoping review;Armas A;Patient Educ Couns [Internet],2018
3. Comunicação de más notícias: revisão integrativa de literatura na enfermagem;Fontes CMB;Rev Bras Enferm,2017
4. Delivering bad news: attitudes, feelings and practice characteristics among speech-language pathologists;Gold R;Am J Speech-Language Pathol,2018
5. Pediatrician's experience in announcing bad news;Crosnier-Schoedel C;Arch Pediatr,2018
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献