A comparison of three statistical methods applied in the identification of eating patterns

Author:

Cunha Diana Barbosa1,Almeida Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues de1,Pereira Rosângela Alves1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Abstract

This work aimed to compare the results of three statistical methods applied in the identification of dietary patterns. Data from 1,009 adults between the ages of 20 and 65 (339 males and 670 females) were collected in a population-based cross-sectional survey in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Information on food consumption was obtained using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. A factor analysis, cluster analysis, and reduced rank regression (RRR) analysis were applied to identify dietary patterns. The patterns identified by the three methods were similar. The factor analysis identified "mixed", "Western", and "traditional" eating patterns and explained 35% of the data variance. The cluster analysis identified "mixed" and "traditional" patterns. In the RRR, the consumption of carbohydrates and lipids were included as response variables and again "mixed" and "traditional" patterns were identified. Studies comparing these methods can help to inform decisions as to which procedures best suit a specific research scenario.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference45 articles.

1. A new approach to the study of diet and risk of type 2 diabetes;Jinlin F;J Postgrad Med,2007

2. New approaches to the study of dietary patterns;van Dam RM;Br J Nutr,2005

3. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology;Hu FB;Curr Opin Lipidol,2002

4. Dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer in the ORDET cohort;Sieri S;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2004

5. Are food patterns associated with prostate cancer in Jamaican men: a preliminary report;Jackson M;Infect Agent Cancer,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3