Does the time between collecting and processing umbilical cord blood samples affect the quality of the sample?

Author:

Barini Ricardo1,Ferraz Ubirajara Costa2,Acácio Gregório Lorenzo2,Machado Isabela Nelly1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Brazil

2. Univesidade de Taubaté - UNITAU, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association between the time from umbilical cord blood collection until processing and the quality of the sample. Methods: Umbilical cord blood samples collected during the third stage of labor were placed in temperature-controlled boxes for the transport of biological material and sent to an umbilical cord blood bank, where the number of nucleated cells, viable cells and CD34+ cells were counted, and samples were additionally tested for contamination at the following time intervals: up to 24 hours, up to 48 hours and up to 72 hours following sampling. Data were analyzed using the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and compared using McNemar's χ2 test. Significance was defined at p < 0.05. Results: Means and medians of the number of nucleated cells, viable cells and CD34+ cells decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) as a function of the increased time between sampling and analysis, the difference between 24 and 48 hours being less than the difference between 24 and 72 hours. A linear correlation was found between the mean number of viable cells and CD34+ cells at the three moments of analysis. Contamination testing was negative in all samples. Conclusion: The increase in time interval from sampling until analysis negatively affected the number of nucleated cells, viable cells and CD34+ cells but was not associated with specimen contamination. A linear correlation was found between decrease in the number of viable cells and CD34+ cells.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. The therapeutic potential of stem cells from adults;Kuehnle I;BMJ,2002

2. Human umbilical cord blood banking and transplantation: a state of the art;Fasouliotis SJ;Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2000

3. Umbilical cord blood collection, banking, and transplantation: current status and issues relevant to perinatal caregivers;Smith FO;Birth,2000

4. History of the clinical use of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic cells;Gluckman E;Cytotherapy,2005

5. Collection and processing of umbilical cord blood for cryopreservation;U-pratya Y;J Med Assoc Thai,2003

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3