Entrepreneurial learning research: a positivist tradition?

Author:

Arantes Fernanda Paula1ORCID,Freitag Maria Salete Batista1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to systematically review the literature on Entrepreneurial Learning, analyzing the elements of studies published on the subject over time, with special emphasis on methodological approaches employed in empirical research. The motivation of the study is that this literature field is still fragmented. Moreover, previous reviews on the theme have not shed sufficient light on the methodological aspects of the research. Data were obtained through the Scopus database, and 356 articles were mapped with the support of VOSviewer software, revealing the evolution in the number of publications, cross-country relationships, and co-citation networks, among other metrics. An in-depth analysis of 38 articles published in the top five journals revealed the predominance of studies carried out in the European context, with entrepreneurs of technological companies, and at the individual level of analysis. Furthermore, a tradition of positivist studies was identified.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference69 articles.

1. A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of scopus and web of science;Aksnes D. W.;Journal of Data and Information Science,2019

2. Qualitative and Quantitative Research Paradigms in Business Research: A Philosophical Reflection;Antwi S. K.;European Journal of Business and Management,2015

3. Can experiential knowledge and localised learning in start-up policy and practice be transferred between regions? The case of the START network;Atherton A.;Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,2008

4. The challenge of using a ‘non-positivist’ paradigm and getting through the peer-review process;Bonache J;Human Resource Management Journal,2021

5. Observing entrepreneurs in networks: Reflecting on the relationship between the researcher and the participants;Brett V.;International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3