The modern slavery wheel as the new theoretical framework

Author:

BAPTISTA RODRIGO MARTINS1ORCID,SOUZA MARIA TEREZA SARAIVA DE2ORCID,BANDEIRA MARIANA LIMA3ORCID,BAPTISTA JOSÉ RICARDO1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UNIVERSIDADE PRESBITERIANA MACKENZIE, Brazil

2. CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO FEI, BRAZIL

3. UNIVERSIDAD ANDINA SIMÓN BOLÍVAR, Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract A few research papers on modern slavery have outlined how this phenomenon flourishes and persists despite institutional pressures against inhumane practices. In order to analyze slavery from an institutional perspective and answer the question of the main factors in the institutional field that sustain modern slavery, qualitative data were collected in the Brazilian context, where the country is widely recognized for its significant actions against modern slavery practices. This study draws on primary and secondary data collected through in-depth interviews and participant observation at conferences, as well as content analysis of documents using NVivo software. The study suggests that certain contextual conditions legitimize organizational practices of formal and informal firms, called institutional deflection. As a contribution to modern slavery management patterns, this article presents the “modern slavery wheel” based on the results of a dynamic cycle that incorporates and systematizes the elements that support the phenomenon. Wheel mechanisms such as favorite conditioning, recurrence, enticement, and truck system seem to contribute to modern slavery practices and their maintenance over time. Moreover, we suggest that these same components may also contribute to breaking the modern slavery wheel

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference72 articles.

1. A bibliometric analysis of the intellectual structure of studies on slavery in the 21st century;Araújo C. C. S.;International Journal of Professional Business Review,2020

2. Disposable people: new slavery in global economy;Bales K,2004

3. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude: A critical analysis of international slavery agreements and concepts of slavery;Bales K.;Human Rights Review,2001

4. Modern slavery: the secret world of 27 million people;Bales K.,2009

5. Desordem ou vácuo institucional? Uma análise dos discursos presentes na educação superior peruana,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3