Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil
2. Prometheus Institute, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: It is recommended that bariatric surgery candidates undergo psychological assessment. However, no specific instrument exists to assess the psychological well-being of bariatric patients, before and after surgery, and for which all constructs are valid for both genders. AIMS: This study aimed to develop and validate a new psychometric instrument to be used before and after bariatric surgery in order to assess psychological outcomes of patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that composed of 660 individuals from the community and bariatric patients. BariTest was developed on a Likert scale consisting of 59 items, distributed in 6 constructs, which assess the psychological well-being that influences bariatric surgery: emotional state, eating behavior, quality of life, relationship with body weight, alcohol consumption, and social support. Validation of BariTest was developed by the confirmatory factor analysis to check the content, criteria, and construct. The R statistical software version 3.5.0 was used in all analyses, and a significance level of 5% was used. RESULTS: Adjusted indices of the confirmatory factor analysis model indicate adequate adjustment. Cronbach’s alpha of BariTest was 0.93, which indicates good internal consistency. The scores of the emotional state, eating behavior, and quality of life constructs were similar between the results obtained in the community and in the postoperative group, being higher than in the preoperative group. Alcohol consumption was similar in the preoperative and postoperative groups and was lower than the community group. CONCLUSIONS: BariTest is a reliable scale measuring the psychological well-being of patients either before or after bariatric surgery.
Reference48 articles.
1. Standards for educational and psychological testing,2014
2. The complex association between bariatric surgery and depression: a national nested-control study;Arhi CS;Obes Surg,2021
3. Statistics notes: cronbach’s alpha;Bland JM;BMJ,1997
4. Adaptação transcultural e validação para o Brasil da Obesity-related Problems Scale;Brasil AMB;Einstein,2017
5. Validation of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with mental disorders: should the 12-Item Scale be an Alternative to 36-Item Scale in DSM-5?;Brasil F;Neuropsychiatry (London),2018
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献