Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2. UFRJ
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke. METHOD: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using standard BIT criteria. The frequency of hemineglect using 6 commonly used screening subtests of this battery was assessed. RESULTS: Hemineglect would not be recognized in 10 patients if they were only screened using the line crossing test; this would be the case in 2 patients with the letter cancellation test; and in 4 patient with the line bisection test. Three patients would not be diagnosed even if both line crossing and line bisection tests were used. CONCLUSION: Hemineglect may not be recognized with single screening tests commonly used. The use of a standard battery is recommended to improve diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with various subtypes of hemineglect.
Subject
Neurology,Clinical Neurology
Reference25 articles.
1. Cognitive deficits following stroke;Riddoch MJ;Physiotherapy,1995
2. Unilateral spatial neglect;Swan L;Phys Ther,2001
3. Assessement of unilateral neglect;Plummer P;Phys Ther,2003
4. Clinical neuropsychology;Heilman KM,1993
5. Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review;Pierce SR;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2002
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献