Adherence to migraine treatment does not depend on the number of prescribed medications

Author:

Dozza Ana Luísa C. Brasil1,Krymchantowski Abouch Valenty2

Affiliation:

1. Neurologist, MD, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Brazil

2. Neurologist, MD, MSc, PhD, Headache Center of Rio, Brazil

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the adherence between monotherapy and politherapy in prophylactic migraine treatment.MethodFive hundred consecutive patients with migraine from a tertiary center were retrospectively studied as to the number of preventive medications prescribed during the first visit. Adherence, defined as returning for the next consultation after 4 to 6 weeks and following the prescribed regimens, were also evaluated and compared between patients.Results71.8% were women, and 6% of the patients did not receive any preventive medication, 11.4% received one drug, 22.2% two drugs, 41.4% three drugs, and 19% four drugs for the prevention of migraine. The overall adherence was 79.6%. Respectively, 73.7, 71.8, 82.6 and 86.3% of those who received the prescription of one, two, three and four drugs returned, complying with the treatment.ConclusionThere is no difference in adherence to monotherapy or politherapy (one to four drugs) for the prophylaxis of migraine.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Neurology,Clinical Neurology

Reference26 articles.

1. A record of patient encounters in neurological in practice in the United Kingdon;Hopkins A;J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1989

2. Evaluation o referrals toa department of neurology;Bekkelund SI;J R Coll Physicians Lond,1996

3. Primary headaches in an outpatient neurology headache clinic in East Hungary;Gesztelyi G;Eur J Neurol,2004

4. Noncompliance may render migraine prophylaxis useless, but once-daily regimens are better;Mulleners WM;Cephalalgia,1998

5. Effects of referral to a specialist for headache;Fitzpatrick RM;J R Soc Med,1983

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3