Content validation of the nursing diagnosis Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad

Author:

Mendes Ryanne Carolynne Marques Gomes1ORCID,Frazão Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz1ORCID,Lacerda Ana Catarina Torres de1ORCID,Lopes Marcos Venícios de Oliveira2ORCID,Linhares Francisca Márcia Pereira1ORCID,Mangueira Suzana de Oliveira1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil

2. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To validate the content of the diagnosis Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad in high-risk pregnant women. Method: Nursing diagnosis content analysis study in which 48 nurses evaluated agreement regarding title, definition, class, and domain of the studied nursing diagnosis, as well as the relevance of its antecedents. The items were considered relevant when the Confidence Interval of the Content Validity Index was 0.8 or higher. When lower, the item was modified or excluded according to the experts’ suggestions. Results: Out of 21 antecedents, 14 were considered relevant. The labels of five elements considered irrelevant were changed, and one item was excluded. The experts did not choose the title and definition proposed by NANDA-I, preferring instead the ones suggested in this study. The experts agreed with the class and domain proposed by the taxonomy. Conclusion: Ten risk factors, four populations at risk, and six associated conditions for this nursing diagnosis were maintained; these may provide a basis for nursing practice. The phase of clinical validation is suggested to be conducted to corroborate this study’s results.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference27 articles.

1. High risk pregnancy;Holness N;Nur Clin North Am,2018

2. Pregnancy at very advanced maternal age: a UK population based cohort study;Fitzpatrick KE;BJOG,2016

3. Maternal risk during pregnancy: a concept analysis;Van Otterloo LR;J Clin Nurs,2016

4. High risk pregnancies and factors associated with neonatal death;Demitto MO;Rev Esc Enferm USP,2017

5. Diagnósticos de enfermagem da NANDA: definições e classificação 2015- 2017;Herdman TH,2018

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3