Nursing workload: influence of indirect care interventions

Author:

Souza Priscilla de1ORCID,Cucolo Danielle Fabiana2ORCID,Perroca Marcia Galan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hospital de Base, Brazil

2. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil

3. Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate nurses’ perception of the degree of interference of indirect care interventions on the team’s workload and to verify the association between these interventions and the professional and institutional variables. Method: A research survey through e-mail conducted with clinical nurses, unit managers and service managers from eight Brazilian states. A questionnaire containing 28 indirect care interventions and their definitions proposed by the Nursing Interventions Classification was applied. Results: A total of 151 clinical nurses participated, and a response rate of 14.8% was obtained. The indirect care interventions reported as those which most increase the workload were: Preceptor: employee (M = 3.2), Employee Development (M = 3.1), Physician Support (M = 3.0) and Conflict mediation (M = 3.0). Statistically significant associations between the investigated interventions and the institutional variables (legal nature and size) were evidenced. Conclusion: Nurses in different practice scenarios perceive that indirect care interventions influence the workload in a differentiated way, with emphasis on the demands related to the monitoring and qualification of employees.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

General Nursing

Reference29 articles.

1. Dimensões do trabalho do enfermeiro no contexto hospitalar;Presotto GV;Rev RENE,2014

2. NIC: Nursing Interventions Classifications;Bulechek GM,2016

3. The new version of a patient classification instrument: assessment of psychometric properties;Perroca MG;J Adv Nurs,2013

4. Nursing workload: a concept analysis;Alghamdi MG;J Nurs Manag,2016

5. Nurses’ experiences of nonpatient factors that affect nursing workload: a study of the PAONCIL instrument’s nonpatient factors;Fagerström L;Nurs Res Pract,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3