“Early Treatment”, Anti-Vaccination, and Denialism: who are the Doctors for Life in the COVID-19 pandemic context in Brazil?

Author:

Ferrari Isaura Wayhs1ORCID,Grisotti Márcia1ORCID,Amorim Lucas de Carvalho de2ORCID,Rodrigues Larissa Zancan1ORCID,Ribas Marcella Trindade1ORCID,Silva Cristiane Uflacker da1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil

2. Universidade de Brasília, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract The article aims to identify who the “Doctors for Life” are, their academic and professional information, which assumptions have been mobilized for the defense of “early treatment” and the denial of vaccines for COVID-19, and the representativeness of their discourses in the medical practice context in Brazil. The analysis is based on a list of 276 doctors’ names, cataloged from their website, and on academic and professional information obtained through research on the Federal Medical Conseil website and the Scientific and Technological Development Nacional Council platform. The content analysis points to the centrality of the medical specialties of homeopathy and acupuncture in the population of Doctors for Life when compared to the set of specialist doctors in Brazil. The significant accession of homeopaths and acupuncturists to the Doctors for Life movement can clarify the understanding of specific medical rationalities, allowing us to distinguish which categories and ideas about the health-disease process are in dispute. It is concluded that, more than describing the problem, it is needed to establish its correlations with a group of events, practices, political decisions, economic linkages, shared beliefs, and a chain of processes that configure its undeniably social characteristics.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference28 articles.

1. Do Governo dos Vivos;Foucault M,2014

2. A hipótese vacinal: por uma abordagem crítica e antropológica de um fenômeno histórico;Moulin AM;Hist Cien Saude Manguinhos,2003

3. O negacionismo no poder: como fazer frente ao ceticismo que atinge a ciência e a política [Internet];Roque T,2020

4. Da divisão do trabalho social;Durkheim E,1999

5. Os médicos no Brasil: um retrato da realidade;Machado MH,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3