Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil
2. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract The aim of the present study was to map the available evidence on the mental health risk factors of frontline health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a systematic review that followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The search was independently carried out by four researchers, following the selection criteria in the electronic databases: PubMed Central, Ovid Technologies, GALE Academic Onefile, Science Citation Index Expanded. The data processing used Zotero software, responsible for creating and importing items according to the criteria established by the research. A total of 18,733 articles were found, of which 2,722 were excluded by the Zotero software because they were in duplicate, and another 366 were manually excluded. After applying the selection criteria, 43 articles entered the final analysis of this review. It is recommended that new scientific research be carried out, especially focusing on the analysis of health workers’ mental health, aiming at providing the basis to create and implement public mental health programs and policies for workers.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference53 articles.
1. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report-87 [Internet],2019
2. COVID-19 adverse mental health outcomes for healthcare workers;Gold JA;BMJ,2020
3. A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas;Page MJ;RevPanm Salud Publica,2022
4. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies what are they and which is better?;Ma LL;Military Med Res,2020
5. Quality Assessment Tool for Observation-al Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies [Internet],2017