Strategies to approach the judicialization of health in Brazil: an evidence brief

Author:

Floriano Fabiana Raynal1ORCID,Boeira Laura2ORCID,Biella Carla de Agostino1ORCID,Pereira Viviane Cássia3ORCID,Carvalho Marcel2ORCID,Barreto Jorge Otávio Maia3ORCID,Oliveira Sandra Maria do Valle Leone de4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministério da Saúde, Brazil

2. Instituto Veredas, Brasil

3. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brazil

4. Fiocruz Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

Abstract

Abstract This article seeks to identify and discuss evidence-informed options to address the judicialization of health. The Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials Tools were used to define the problem and the search strategy, which was carried out in the following databases: PubMed, Health Systems Evidence, Campbell, Cochrane Collaboration, Rx for Change Database, and PDQ-Evidence. Selection and assessment of methodological quality was performed by two independent reviewers. The results were presented in a narrative synthesis. This study selected 19 systematic reviews that pointed out four strategies to address the judicialization of health in Brazil: 1) Rapid response service, 2) Continuous education program, 3) Mediation service between the parties involved, and 4) Adoption of a computer-based, online decision-making support tool and patient-mediated interventions. This study therefore presented and characterized four options that can be considered to address the judicialization of health. The implementation of these options must ensure the participation of different actors, reflecting on different contexts and the impact on the health system. The availability of human and financial resources and the training of teams are critical points for the successful implementation of the options.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference41 articles.

1. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988,1988

2. Lei nº 8.080, de 19 de setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências,1990

3. Right to health, essential medicines, and lawsuits for access to medicines-a scoping study;Vargas-Peláez C;Soc Sci Med,2014

4. Judicialization of access to medicines in four Latin American countries a comparative qualitative analysis;Vargas-Pelaez C;Int J Equity Health,2019

5. Orçamento temático de acesso a medicamentos 2019,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3