Affiliation:
1. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
2. Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor, Brasil
Abstract
Abstract Food industries are reformulating their products to lower total sugar and caloric content. Caloric sugars are often substituted by or combined with non-caloric sweeteners. Our study analyzed information about the presence, number and type, and content of different sweeteners displayed on the ingredient list of 10 key ultra-processed products (UPP), from 3 different categories. It also assessed consumers’ opinions, perceptions and understanding of caloric and non-caloric sugars used in UPPs using data from 12 focus group discussions. Results indicate a large diversity in sweeteners, frequent use of a combination of multiple caloric and non-caloric sweeteners, often in the same product, and a lack of disclosure of the amounts of non-caloric sweeteners on the nutrition labels. Qualitative analysis reflected the inconsistency of information on nutrition labels and the challenges in compliance with regulations. Participants were unsure about the different types of sweeteners, examples of artificial sweeteners and their potential health consequences. Presenting clearer additive and nutrition information would facilitate consumer comprehension and support healthy food choices.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference60 articles.
1. Noncommunicable diseases,2018
2. The impact of dietary and metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mortality in Brazil;Otto MC;PLoS One,2016
3. Ultra-processed foods what they are and how to identify them;Monteiro CA;Public Health Nutri,2019
4. Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil;Louzada ML;Rev Saude Publica,2015
5. Total, added, and free sugars are restrictive guidelines science-based or achievable?;Erickson J;Nutrients,2015
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献