Affiliation:
1. Gannan Normal University, China
2. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Estimating leaf chlorophyll contents through leaf reflectance spectra is efficient and nondestructive. The literature base regarding optical indices (particularly chlorophyll indices) is wide ranging and extensive. However, it is without much consensus regarding robust indices for Gannan navel orange. To address this problem, this study investigated the performance of 19 published indices using RDS (raw data spectrum), FDS (first derivative data spectrum) and SDS (second derivative data spectrum) for the estimation of chlorophyll content in navel orange leaves. The single spectral index and combination of multiple spectral indices were compared for their accuracy in predicting chlorophyll a content (Chla), chlorophyll b content (Chlb) and total chlorophyll content (Chltot) content in navel orange leaves by using partial least square regression (PLSR), adaboost regression (AR), random forest regression (RFR), decision tree regression (DTR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) models. Through the comparison of the above data in three datasets, the optimal modeling data set is RDS data, followed by FDS data, and the worst is SDS data. In modeling with multiple spectral indices, good results were obtained for Chla (NDVI750, NDVI800), Chlb (Datt, DD, Gitelson 2) and Chltot (Datt, DD, Gitelson2) by corresponding index combinations. Overall, we can find that the AR is also the best regression method judging by prediction performance from the results of single spectral index models and multiple spectral indices models. In comparison, result of multiple spectral indices models is better than single spectral index models in predicting Chla and Chltot content using FDS data and SDS data, respectively.
Subject
General Veterinary,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference36 articles.
1. Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content Using Red Edge Parameters - ScienceDirect;A C. H. J.;Pedosphere,2010
2. Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b, Chlorophyll a+b, and Total Carotenoid Content in Eucalyptus Leaves;DATT BISUN;;Remote Sensing of Environment.,1998
3. Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density;BROGE N. H.;Remote Sensing of Environment,,2001
4. A new technique for extracting the red edge position from hyperspectral data: The linear extrapolation method;CHO M.;Remote Sensing of Environment,2006
5. Influence of Spectral Bandwidth and Position on Chlorophyll Content Retrieval at Leaf and Canopy Levels.;DIAN Y.;Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing,2015