Human rights violations in normalizing procedures on intersex children

Author:

Leivas Paulo Gilberto Cogo1ORCID,Schiavon Amanda de Almeida2ORCID,Resadori Alice Hertzog3ORCID,Vanin Aline Aver4ORCID,Almeida Alexandre do Nascimento3ORCID,Machado Paula Sandrine2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministério Público Federal, Brasil; Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil

2. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

3. Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil

4. Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil; Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil

Abstract

Intersex children in Brazil are still subjected to “normalizing” surgical procedures and subsequent bodily interventions to make their bodies conform to binary views of sex. Resolution n. 1,664/2003 of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine legitimizes interventions upon intersex bodies, being the only national normative instrument that address the subject. However, the demands of international intersex political activism have denounced how early childhood interventions for sex designation mutilate children’s bodies and violate a number of human rights. This research discusses how early, irreversible, and normalizing procedures performed without the intersex person’s consent are human rights violations. Based on the concept of epistemic (in)justice, we first look at the disputes surrounding the evidence that underpin medical practices. We demonstrate how such procedures violate human rights to health, body integrity, autonomy, and sexual and reproductive rights, analyzing which strategies were put into place to prevent them. We propose that intersex people be at the center of decisions regarding their bodies, that non-surgical paths be discussed with patients and their family members, and that early, invasive, mutilating, harmful, cosmetic, and unconsented surgical interventions on intersex children be prohibited. Guiding tools must introduce changes into its regulatory bias to, from an interdisciplinary perspective, include bioethical and human rights bodies, as well as intersex activists.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference66 articles.

1. Resolução nº 1.664, de 13 de maio de 2003. Define as normas técnicas necessárias para o tratamento de pacientes portadores de anomalias de diferenciação sexual.;Diário Oficial da União,2003

2. Nascidos livres e iguais: orientação sexual e identidade de gênero no regime internacional de direitos humanos.,2019

3. Interdicciones: escrituras de la intersexualidad en castellano.;Cabral M,2009

4. Intersex human rights, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex characteristics and the Yogyakarta principles plus 10.;Carpenter M;Cult Health Sex,2021

5. Intersexo: aspectos jurídicos, internacionais, trabalhistas, registrais, médicos, psicológicos, sociais, culturais.;Vieira AM,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3