Trends in general and public health scientific output of authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions among high-impact and SciELO journals: 1995-2019

Author:

Celeste Roger Keller1ORCID,Gehrke Gabriela Hames1ORCID,Santos Camila Mello dos1ORCID,Moyses Samuel Jorge2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

2. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Brazil

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the percentage of articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions in high-impact journals and SciELO journals and to evaluate trends in 5-year citations according to the author's affiliation and journal category. Bibliometric data were obtained using Scopus database from 1995 to 2019. Publications were selected from four journal categories: High-impact General Health (HGH), High-impact Public Health (HPH), SciELO General Health (SGH) and SciELO Public Health (SPH). The number of citations that were received five years after publication and the percentage of publications with any author affiliated to Brazil were calculated by each year. The same 146 journals were followed. There was a significant increase in percentage of articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions in all sets of journals. Among HGH, there was an increasing from 0.3% to 1.5% between 1995-2019, for HPH from 1% to 3%, for SGH from 49.7% to 55.4%, and for SPH from 47.4% to 71.9%. There was a significant (p < 0.01) increase in the mean of 5-year citations in all groups and Brazilian affiliated articles increased more than average. For each 10 years, average HGH articles increased 11.9 citations and Brazilian affiliated articles 32.0 citations. The results suggest that the presence of Brazilian science is increasing, and the scientific impact has increased more than average.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference43 articles.

1. Letter to the Editor about the quality and impact of scientific articles;Ricker M;Scientometrics,2017

2. New quality and quantity indices in science (NewQIS) results of the first decade - project progress review;Groneberg DA;Scientometrics,2019

3. The challenge of assessing the impact of science beyond bibliometrics;Barreto ML;Rev Saúde Pública,2013

4. A pesquisa médica e biomédica no Brasil comparações com o desempenho científico brasileiro e mundial;Guimarães JA;Ciênc Saúde Colet,2004

5. Brasil aumenta produção científica, mas impacto dos trabalhos diminui.;Moraes FT;Folha de S.Paulo,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3