Affiliation:
1. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil
2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil; Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose To analyze the performance of students aged between in an auditory skills screening software program, considering the influence of biological determinants and the correlation of auditory tasks with the behavioral assessment tests of central auditory processing (PAC), as well as to present the cutoff points of the battery. Methods In the first stage, the sample consisted of 96 students with typical development, who underwent hearing screening at school. A self-perception questionnaire and the auditory tasks of sound localization (SL), temporal resolution (TR), temporal ordering of frequency (OT-F) and duration (OT-D), auditory closure (AC), dichotic digit- binaural integration (DD) and figure-ground (FG) were applied. Of these, 66 children participated in the second stage of the study, including basic and behavioral audiological assessment from PAC. Results The gender variable influenced the DD task to the right ear. Age influenced the outcome of five auditory tasks. The right ear performed better in the DD and OT-F tasks. At the age between 6 and 7 years, there was a correlation between screening and diagnosis in the tasks of AC, TR, DD, FG, and OT-F. At the age of 8 years, there was a correlation in the DD and OT-F tasks. The pass/fail criteria varied according to the task and biological determinants. Conclusion There was a correlation between screening and diagnosis in a greater number of tasks in the age group between 6 and 7 years. The cut-off points for the auditory tasks should be analyzed according to age, sex and/or ear side.
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Otorhinolaryngology,Language and Linguistics
Reference32 articles.
1. ASHA: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
2. Comorbidity of auditory processing, language, and reading disorders;Sharma M;J Speech Lang Hear Res,2009
3. Cortical auditory-evoked potential and behavioral evidence for differences in auditory processing between good and poor readers;Barker MD;J Am Acad Audiol,2017
4. Selected issues in screening for central auditory processing dysfunction;Musiek FE;Semin Hear,1990
5. Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: from science to practice;Bellis TJ,2011