Changing face-to-face psychological care to remote mode: facilitators and obstacles in the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Santos Jorge Henrique Correa dos1ORCID,Sola Pamela Perina Braz1ORCID,Santos Manoel Antônio dos1ORCID,Oliveira-Cardoso Érika Arantes de1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil

Abstract

Objective: to verify associations between sociodemographic variables and factors that facilitate and hinder the transition from face-to-face psychological care to remote mode in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: this is an analytical, quantitative, cross-sectional study. After approval by the Research Ethics Committee, data collection was performed by applying an online form consisting of 55 questions. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics techniques. Results: the intentional sampling consisted of a total of 385 Brazilian psychologists, mostly women (67.01%), young professionals with up to five years of graduation (44.16%) most of activities in the private clinic. It was found that training time between five and 10 years was associated with a greater perception of difficulties and that previous experience with remote care facilitated adaptation in the transition from one modality to another. Conclusion: considering that call center can be a powerful tool in the health scenario, it is suggested the inclusion of remote care issues in the research agenda and syllabus in the curricula of health training courses.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference32 articles.

1. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients;Al-Quteimat OM;Am J Clin Oncol,2020

2. WHO: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak;WHO,2020

3. On the possibility of interrupting the coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic based on the best available scientific evidence;Silva AAM;Rev Bras Epidemiol,2020

4. COVID-19 pandemic implications for education and reflections for school psychology;Oliveira WA;Psic Teor Prat,2021

5. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence;Brooks SK;Lancet,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3