Validation of a moral distress instrument in nurses of primary health care

Author:

Barth Priscila Orlandi1,Ramos Flávia Regina Souza2,Barlem Edison Luiz Devos3,Dalmolin Graziele de Lima4,Schneider Dulcinéia Ghizoni1

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil

2. Univerisdade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil

3. Universidade Federal de Rio Grande, Brazil

4. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to validate an instrument to identify situations that trigger moral distress in relation to intensity and frequency in primary health care nurses. Method: this is a methodological study carried out with 391 nurses of primary health care, applied to the Brazilian Scale of Moral Distress in Nurses with 57 questions. Validation for primary health care was performed through expert committee evaluation, pre-test, factorial analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: there were 46 questions validated divided into six constructs: Health Policies, Working Conditions, Nurse Autonomy, Professional ethics, Disrespect to patient autonomy and Work Overload. The instrument had satisfactory internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha 0.98 for the instrument, and between 0.96 and 0.88 for the constructs. Conclusion: the instrument is valid and reliable to be used in the identification of the factors that trigger moral distress in primary care nurses, providing subsidies for new research in this field of professional practice.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Reference35 articles.

1. A reflection on moral distress in nursing together with a current application of the concept;Jameton A;J Bioeth Inq,2013

2. Nurse moral distress a proposed theory and research agenda;Corley MC;Nurs Ethics,2002

3. Conceptual framework for the study of moral distress in nurses;Ramos FRS;Texto Contexto Enferm,2016

4. Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale;Corley MC;J Adv Nurs,2001

5. Moral distress: A review of the argument-based nursing ethics literature;Mccarthy J;Nurs Ethics,2015

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3