Affiliation:
1. University of São Paulo, Brazil
2. Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the Knoop hardness of three high viscous glass ionomer cements: G1 - Ketac Molar; G2 - Ketac Molar Easymix (3M ESPE) and G3 - Magic Glass ART (Vigodent). As a parallel goal, three different methods for insertion of Ketac Molar Easymix were tested: G4 - conventional spatula; G5 - commercial syringe (Centrix) and G6 - low-cost syringe. Ten specimens of each group were prepared and the Knoop hardness was determined 5 times on each specimen with a HM-124 hardness machine (25 g/30 s dwell time) after 24 h, 1 and 2 weeks. During the entire test period, the specimens were stored in liquid paraffin at 37ºC. Significant differences were found between G3 and G1/G2 (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test; p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the results among the multiple ways of insertion. The glass ionomer cement Magic Glass ART showed the lowest hardness, while the insertion technique had no significant influence on hardness.
Reference20 articles.
1. A new translucent cement for dentistry;Wilson AD;The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J,1972
2. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) for dental caries;Frencken JO,1999
3. Environmental degradation of glass-ionomer cements: a depth-sensing microindentation study;Wang XY;J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater,2007
4. Viscous glass-ionomer cements: a new alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition?;R Frankenberger;Quintessence Int,1997
5. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods;Kleverlaan CJ;Dental Mater,2004
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献