Work, malaise, and well-being in Spanish and Latin-American doctors

Author:

Ochoa Paola1,Blanch Josep M2

Affiliation:

1. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador

2. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, España

Abstract

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the relations between the meanings of working and the levels of doctors work well-being in the context of their working conditions. METHOD The research combined the qualitative methodology of textual analysis and the quantitative one of correspondence factor analysis. A convenience, intentional, and stratified sample composed of 305 Spanish and Latin American doctors completed an extensive questionnaire on the topics of the research. RESULTS The general meaning of working for the group located in the quartile of malaise included perceptions of discomfort, frustration, and exhaustion. However, those showing higher levels of well-being, located on the opposite quartile, associated their working experience with good conditions and the development of their professional and personal competences. CONCLUSIONS The study provides empirical evidence of the relationship between contextual factors and the meanings of working for participants with higher levels of malaise, and of the importance granted both to intrinsic and extrinsic factors by those who scored highest on well-being.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference31 articles.

1. Malestar psicofisiológico en profesionales de la salud pública de la Región Metropolitana;Ansoleaga Moreno E;Rev Med Chile,2011

2. Personas que cuidan personas: dimensión humana y trabajo en salud;Ansoleaga Moreno E,2012

3. International perspectives on the meanings of work and working: current research and theory;Ardichvili A;Adv Dev Hum Resour,2009

4. Personas que cuidan personas: dimensión humana y trabajo en salud;Artaza O,2012

5. Cuestionario de bienestar laboral general: estructura y propriedades psicométricas;Blanch JM;Rev Psicol Trab Organ,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3