Affiliation:
1. Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil
Abstract
ABSTRACT This essay aims to motivate an epistemic non-individualistic conception of reflection. The proposal is non-individualistic because (a) it addresses more than individual metacognitive performance and (b) it refers to a situation in which two or more people are in dialogical disagreement about the same subject matter or target proposition; (c) their dispute is based on conversational space and they are entitled to expect one another to be engaged in attempts at truth, avoidance of error, and understanding. I call this proposal a Dialectical account of Reflection (DaR). According to (DaR), reflection is a conscious and intentional intellectual operation through which an individual becomes aware of the contents of disputed beliefs in a dialogical or interpersonal exchange, involving both her own beliefs and the beliefs of her interlocutors. In (DaR), reflection produces the epistemic good of avoiding epistemic vices and promoting epistemic moderation.
Reference64 articles.
1. In Defense of Veritistic Value Monism;AHLSTROM-VIJ K.;Pacific Philosophical Quarterly,2013
2. Concepts of Epistemic Justification;ALSTON W. P.;The Monist,1985
3. Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology;ALSTON W. P.;Philosophical Topics,1986
4. Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge;ALSTON W. P.,1989
5. Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism;BERGMANN M.,2008