Affiliation:
1. Nanjing Normal University, China
Abstract
ABSTRACT The article is dedicated to the argument against the Existence Requirement provided by Takashi Yagisawa. We argue that the core of Yagisawa s argument – the Strong Iterability – cannot be inferred from the idea of contingent apriori (Kripke), and is incompatible with the idea of @-transform (Plantinga). Thus, these ideas, contrary to Yagisawa, cannot serve as a methodological basis of the Strong Iterability. We also argue that the Strong Iterability is incompatible with the Constituent Principle. Finally, we show that the concept of world-indexed properties (the argument of Yagisawa relies on the idea of world-indexed properties) is inconsistent, and even if the defender of Strong Iterability can resist this objection, the Strong Iterability must be given up.
Reference30 articles.
1. “A new argument from actualism to serious actualism”;BERGMANN M.;NOÛS,1996
2. “A new defence of the modal existence requirement”;CAPLAN B.;Synthese,2007
3. “The worlds of possibility. Modal realism and the semantics of modal logic”;CHIHARA C.,1998
4. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.;DUZI M.,2010
5. Modality and tense: philosophical papers;FINE K.,2005